If not bonds, then what?
Featured writing by Allan Norman · M.Sc. · CFP · CIM
A reader frustrated with what bond ETFs have delivered lately asks Allan whether there is something better to hold for the fixed-income sleeve of a balanced portfolio. Rather than pointing to a replacement product, he steps back to what bonds are actually there to do: reduce a portfolio's overall risk, make the ride more palatable day to day, and provide a measure of safety and diversification against the swings of the stock market. He walks through how bond returns have looked historically and weighs that against what leaning harder on equities would mean for a portfolio's ups and downs, especially for someone who is drawing an income from it rather than simply letting it grow. The honest answer is that there is no single substitute that does everything a bond does. It is a grounded read for anyone eyeing their fixed-income holdings and wondering whether to trade some safety for better returns, particularly retirees who cannot simply ride out a bad stretch.
Read Allan's full column on MoneySense.
Read on MoneySenseHave a question of your own?
Most of Allan's columns started with a reader's question. Yours could be the next conversation.



